1820 TO 1850

ANNO 1826.

I. page 58.


BY an agreement with the State of Georgia the year 1802, the United States became bound, in consideration of the cession of the western territory, now constituting the States of Alabama and Mississippi, to extinguish the remainder of the Indian title within her limits, and to remove the Indians from the State ;  of which large and valuable portions were then occupied by the Creeks and Cherokees.  No time was limited for the fulfilment of this obligation ;  and near a quarter of a century had passed away without seeing its full execution.  At length Georgia, seeing no end to this delay, became impatient, and justly so, the long delay being equivalent to a breach of the agreement ;  for, although no time was limited for its execution, yet a reasonable time was naturally understood, and that incessant and faithful endeavors should be made by the United States to comply with her undertaking.  In the years 1824-’25 this had become a serious question between the United States and Georgia—the compact being but partly complied with—and Mr. Monroe, in the last year of his Administration, and among its last acts, had the satisfaction to conclude a treaty with the Creek Indians for a cession of all their claims in the State, and their removal from it.  This was the treaty of the Indian Springs, negotiated the 12th of February, 1825, the famous chief, Gen. Wm. McIntosh, and some fifty other chiefs signing it in the presence of Mr. Crowell, the United States Indian agent.  It ceded all the Creek country in Georgia, and also several millions of acres in the State of Alabama.  Complaints followed it to Washington as having been concluded by McIntosh without the authority of the nation.  The ratification of the treaty was opposed, but finally carried, and by the strong vote of 34 to 4.  Disappointed in their opposition to the treaty at Washington, the discontented party became violent at home, killed McIntosh and another chief, declared forcible resistance to the execution of the treaty, and prepared to resist.  Georgia, on her part, determined to execute it by taking possession of the ceded territory.  The Government of the United States felt itself bound to interfere.  The new President, Mr. Adams, became impressed with the conviction that the treaty had been made without due authority, and that its execution ought not to be enforced ;  and sent Gen. Gaines with federal troops to the confines of Georgia.  All Georgia was in a flame at this view of force, and the neighboring States sympathized with her.  In the mean time the President, anxious to avoid violence, and to obtain justice for Georgia, treated further ;  and assembling the head men and chiefs of the Creeks at Washington City, concluded a new treaty with them (January, 1826) ;  by which the treaty of Indian Springs was annulled, and a substitute for it negotiated, ceding all the Creek lands in Georgia, but none in Alabama.  This treaty, with a message detailing all the difficulties of the question, was immediately communicated by the President to the Senate, and by it referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs, of which I was chairman.  The committee reported against the ratification of the treaty, earnestly deprecated a collision of arms between the federal government and a State, and recommended further negotiations—a thing the more easy as the Creek chiefs were still at Washington.  The objections to the new treaty were :

1.  That it annulled the McIntosh treaty ;  thereby implying its illegality, and apparently justifying the fate of its authors.

2.  Because it did not cede the whole of the Creek lands in Georgia.

3.  Because it ceded none in Alabama.

Further negotiations according to the recommendation of the Senate, were had by the President ;  and on the 31st of March of the same year, a supplemental article was concluded, by which all the Creek lands in Georgia were ceded to her ;  and the Creeks within her borders bound to emigrate to a new home beyond the Mississippi.  The vote in the Senate on ratifying this new treaty, and its supplemental article, was full and emphatic—thirty to seven :  and the seven negatives all Southern senators favorable to the object, but dissatisfied with the clause which annulled the McIntosh treaty and implied a censure upon its authors.  Northern senators voted in a body to do this great act of justice to Georgia, restrained by no unworthy feeling against the growth and prosperity of a slave State.  And thus was carried into effect, after a delay of a quarter of a century, and after great and just complaint on the part of Georgia, the compact between that State and the United States of 1802.  Georgia was paid at last for her great cession of territory, and obtained the removal of an Indian community out of her limits, and the use and dominion of all her soil for settlement and jurisdiction.  It was an incalculable advantage to her, and sought in vain under three successive Southern Presidents—Jefferson, Madison, Monroe—(who could only obtain part concessions from the Indians)—and now accomplished under a Northern President, with the full concurrence and support of the Northern delegations in Congress :  for the Northern representatives in the House voted the appropriations to carry the treaty into effect as readily as the senators had voted the ratification of the treaty itself.  Candid men, friends to the harmony and stability of this Union, should remember these things when they hear the Northern States, on account of the conduct of some societies and individuals, charged with unjust and criminal designs towards the South.

An incident which attended the negotiation of the supplemental article to the treaty of January deserves to be commemorated, as an instance of the frauds which may attend Indian negotiations, and for which there is so little chance of detection by either of the injured parties,—by the Indians themselves, or by the federal government.  When the President sent in the treaty of January, and after its rejection by the Senate became certain, thereby leaving the federal government and Georgia upon the point of collision, I urged upon Mr. James Barbour, the Secretary at War (of whose department the Indian Office was then a branch) the necessity of a supplemental article ceding all the Creek lands in Georgia ;  and assured him that, with that additional article, the treaty would be ratified, and the question settled.  The Secretary was very willing to do all this, but said it was impossible,—that the chiefs would not agree to it.  I recommended to him to make them some presents, so as to overcome their opposition ;  which he most innocently declined, because it would savor of bribery.  In the mean time it had been communicated, to me, that the treaty already made was itself the work of great bribery ;  the sum of $160,000 out of $247,000, which it stipulated to the Creek nation, as a first payment, being a fund for private distribution among the chiefs who negotiated it.  Having received this information, I felt quite sure that the fear of the rejection of the treaty, and the consequent loss of these $160,000, to the negotiating chiefs, would insure their assent to the supplemental article without the inducement of further presents.  I had an interview with the leading chiefs, and made known to them the inevitable fact that the Senate would reject the treaty as it stood ;  but would ratify it with a supplemental article ceding all their lands in Georgia.  With this information they agreed to the additional article :  and then the whole was ratified, as I have already stated.  But a further work remained behind.  It was to balk the fraud of the corrupt distribution of $160,000 among a few chiefs ;  and that was to be done in the appropriation bill, and by a clause directing the whole treaty money, to be paid to the nation instead of the chiefs.  The case was communicated to the Senate in secret session, and a committee of conference appointed (Messrs. Benton, Van Buren, and Berrien) to agree with the House committee upon the proper clause to be put into the appropriation bill.  It was also communicated to the Secretary at War.  He sent in a report from Mr. McKinney, the Indian bureau clerk, and actual negotiator of the treaty, admitting the fact of the intended private distribution ;  which, in fact, could not be denied, as I held an original paper showing the names of all the intended recipients, with the sum allowed to each, beginning at $20,000 and ranging down to $5000 :  and that it was done with his cognizance.

Some extracts from speeches delivered, on that occasion will well finish this view of a transaction which at one time threatened violence between a State and the federal government, and in which a great fraud in an Indian treaty was detected and frustrated.


“ Mr. Van Buren said he should state the circumstances of this case, and the views of the committee of conference.  A treaty was made in this city, in which it was stipulated on the part of the United States, that $247,000, together with an annuity of $20,000 a year and other considerations, should be paid to the Creeks, as a consideration for the extinguishment of their title to lands in the State of Georgia, which the United States, under the cession of 1802, were under obligations to extinguish.  The bill from the other House to carry this treaty into effect, directed that the money should be paid and distributed among the chiefs and warriors.  That bill came to the Senate ;  and a confidential communication was made to the Senate, from which it appeared that strong suspicions were entertained that a design existed on the part of the chiefs who made the treaty, to practise a fraud on the Creek nation, by dividing the money amongst themselves and associates.  An amendment was proposed by the Senate, which provided for the payment of those moneys in the usual way, and the distribution of them in the usual manner, and in the usual proportion to which the Indians were entitled.  That amendment was sent to the other House, who, unadvised as to the facts which were known to the Senate, refused to concur in it, and asked a conference.  The conferees, on the part of the Senate, communicated their suspicions to the conferees on the part of the House, and asked them to unite in an application to the Department of War, for information on the subject.  This was accordingly done, and the documents sent, in answer, were a letter from the Secretary of War, and a report by Mr. McKenney.  From that report it appeared clear and satisfactory, that a design thus existed on the part of the Indians, by whom the treaty was negotiated, to distribute of the $247,000 to be paid for the cession by the United States, $159,750 among themselves, and a few favorite chiefs at home, and three Cherokee chiefs who had no interest in the property.  Ridge and Vann were to receive by the original treaty $5000 each.  By this agreement of the distribution of the money each was to receive $15,000 more, making $20,000 for each.  Ridge, the father of Ridge who is here, was to receive $10,000.  The other $100,000 was to be distributed, $5000, and, in some instances, $10,000 to the chiefs who negotiated the treaty here, varying from one to ten thousand dollars each.

“ Mr. V.B. said, in his judgment, the character of the government was involved in this subject, and it would require, under the circumstances of this case, that they should take every step they could rightfully take to exculpate themselves from having, in any degree or form, concurred in this fraud.  The sentiment of the American people where he resided was, and had been, highly excited on this subject ;  they had applauded, in the most ardent manner, the zeal manifested by the government to preserve themselves pure in their negotiations with the Indians ;  and though he was satisfied—though he deemed it impossible to suppose for a moment that government could have countenanced the practice of this fraud, yet there were circumstances in the case which required exculpation.  Between the negotiation of the treaty and the negotiation of the supplementary article on which the treaty was finally adopted, all these circumstances were communicated to the Department of War by the two Cherokees.  Mr. V. B. said it was not his purpose, because the necessity of the case did not require it, to say what the Secretary of War ought to have done, or to censure what he did do, when the information was given to him.  He had known him many years, and there was not an honester man, or a man more devoted to his country, than that gentleman was.  Mr. V.B. said it was not for him to have said what should have been the course of the President of the United States, if the information had been given to him on the subject.  It could not fail to make a mortifying and most injurious impression on the minds of the people of this country, to find that no means whatever were taken for the suppression of this fraud.  There was, and there ought to be, an excitement on the subject in the public mind.”

“ Mr. Benton said, that after the explanation of the views of the committee of conference which had been given by the senator from New-York (Mr. Van Buren), he would limit himself to a statement of facts on two or three points, on which references had been made to his personal knowledge.

“ The Secretary of War had referred to him, in his letter to the committee, as knowing the fact that the Secretary had refused to give private gratuities to the Creek chiefs to promote the success of the negotiation.  The reference was correct.  Mr. B. had himself recommended the Secretary to do so ;  it was, however, about forty days after the treaty had been signed.  He referred to a paper which fixed the date to the 9th or 10th of March, and the treaty had been signed in the month of January preceding.  It was done at the time that Mr. B. had offered his services to procure the supplemental article to be adopted.  The Secretary entirely condemned the practice of giving these gratuities.  Mr. B. said he had recommended it as the only way of treating with barbarians ;  that, if not gratified in this way, the chiefs would prolong the negotiation, at a great daily expense to the government, until they got their gratuity in one way or other, or defeated the treaty altogether.  He considered the practice to be sanctioned by the usage of the United States :  he believed it to be common in all barbarous nations, and in many that were civilized ;  and referred to the article in the federal constitution against receiving “presents” from foreign powers, as a proof that the convention thought such a restriction to be necessary, even among ourselves.

“ The time at which Mr. B. had offered his services to aid this negotiation, had appeared to him to be eminently critical, and big with consequences which he was anxious to avert.  It was after the committee had resolved to report against the new treaty, and before they had made the report to the Senate.  The decision, whatsoever it might be, and the consequent discussions, criminations, and recriminations, were calculated to bring on a violent struggle in the Senate itself ;  between the Senate and the Executive ;  perhaps between the two Houses (for a reference of the subject to both would have taken place) ;  and between one or more States and the federal government.  Mr. B. had concurred in the report against the new treaty, because it divested Georgia of vested rights ;  and, though objectionable in many other respects, he was willing, for the sake of peace, to ratify it, provided the vested rights of Georgia were not invaded.  The supplemental article had relieved him upon this point.  He thought that Georgia had no further cause of dissatisfaction with the treaty ;  it was Alabama that was injured by the loss of some millions of acres, which she had acquired under the treaty of 1825, and lost under that of 1826.  Her case commanded his regrets and sympathy.  She had lost the right of jurisdiction over a considerable extent of territory ;  and the advantages of settling, cultivating, and taxing the same, were postponed ;  but, he hoped, not indefinitely.  But these were consequential advantages, resulting from an act which the government was not bound to do ;  and, though the loss of them was an injury, yet this injury could not be considered as a violation of vested rights ;  but the circumstance certainly increased the strength of her claim to the total extinction of the Indian titles within her limits ;  and, he trusted, would have its due effect upon the Government of the United States.

“ The third and last point on which Mr. B. thought references to his name had made it proper for him to give a statement, related to the circumstance which had induced the Senate to make the amendment which had become the subject of the conference between the two Houses.  He had himself come to the knowledge of that circumstance in the last days of April, some weeks after the supplemental article had been ratified.  He had deemed it to be his duty to communicate it to the Senate, and do it in a way that would avoid a groundless agitation of the public feeling, or unjust reflections upon any individual, white or red, if, peradventure, his information should turn out to have been untrue.  He therefore communicated it to the Senate in secret session ;  and the effect of the information was immediately manifested in the unanimous determination of the Senate to adopt the amendment which was now under consideration.  He deemed the amendment, or one that would effect the same object, to be called for by the circumstances of the case, and the relative state of the parties.  It was apparent that a few chiefs were to have an undue proportion of the money—they had realized what he had foretold to the Secretary ;  and it was certain that the knowledge of this, whenever it should be found out by the nation, would occasion disturbances, and, perhaps, bloodshed.  He thought that the United States should prevent these consequences, by preventing the cause of them, and, for this purpose, he would concur in any amendment that would effect a fair distribution of the money, or any distribution that was agreeable to the nation in open counsel.”

Mr. Berrien :  “ You have arrived at the last scene in the present act of the great political drama of the Creek controversy.  In its progress, you have seen two of the sovereign States of the American Confederation—especially, you have seen one, of those States, which has always been faithful and forward in the discharge of her duties to this Union, driven to the wall, by the combined force of the administration and its allies consisting of a portion of the Creek nation, and certain Cherokee diplomatists.  Hitherto, in the discussions before the Senate on this subject, I have imposed a restraint upon my own feelings under the influence of motives which have now ceased to operate.  It was my first duty to obtain an acknowledgment, on this floor, of the rights of Georgia, repressing, for that purpose, even the story of her wrongs.  It was my first duty, sir, and I have sacrificed to it every other consideration.  As a motive to forbearance it no longer exists.  The rights of Georgia have been prostrated.

“ Sir, in the progress of that controversy, which has grown out of the treaty of the Indian Springs, the people of Georgia have been grossly and wantonly calumniated, and the acts of the administration have assisted to give currency to these calumnies.  Her chief magistrate has been traduced.  The solemn act of her legislature has been set at naught by a rescript of the federal Executive.  A military force has been quartered on her borders to coerce her to submission ;  and without a trial, without the privilege of being heard, without the semblance of evidence, she has been deprived of rights secured to her by the solemn stipulations of treaty.

“ When, in obedience to the will of the legislature of Georgia, her chief magistrate had communicated to the President his determination to survey the ceded territory, his right to do so was admitted.  It was declared by the President that the act would be ‘wholly’ on the responsibility of the government of Georgia, and that ‘the Government of the United States would not be in any manner responsible for any consequences which might result from the measure.’  When his willingness to encounter this responsibility was announced, it was met by the declaration that the President would ‘not permit the survey to be made,’ and he was referred to a major-general of the army of the United States, and one thousand regulars.

“ The murder of McIntosh—the defamation of the chief magistrate of Georgia—the menace of military force to coerce her to submission—were followed by the traduction of two of her cherished citizens, employed as the agents of the General Government in negotiating the treaty—gentlemen whose integrity will not shrink from a comparison with that of the proudest and loftiest of their accusers.  Then the sympathies of the people of the Union were excited in behalf of ‘ the children of the forest,’ who were represented as indignantly spurning the gold, which was offered to entice them from the graves of their fathers and resolutely determined never to abandon the.  The incidents of the plot being thus prepared, the affair hastens to its consummation.  A new treaty is negotiated here—a pure and spotless treaty.  The rights of Georgia and of Alabama are sacrificed ;  the United States obtain a part of the lands, and pay double the amount stipulated by the old treaty ;  and those poor and noble, and unsophisticated sons of the forest, having succeeded in imposing on the simplicity of this government, next concert, under its eye, and with its knowledge, the means of defrauding their own constituents, the chiefs and warriors of the Creek nation.

“ For their agency in exciting the Creeks to resist the former treaty, and in deluding this government to annul it, three Cherokees—Ridge, Vann, and the father of the former—are to receive FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS of the money stipulated to be paid by the United States to the chiefs of the Creek nation ;  and the government, when informed of the projected fraud, deems itself powerless to avert it.  Nay, when apprised by your amendment, that you had also detected it, that government does not hesitate to interpose, by one of its high functionaries, to resist your proceeding, by a singular fatuity, thus giving its countenance and support to the commission of the fraud.  Sir, I speak of what has passed before your eyes even in this hall.

“ One fifth of the whole purchase money is to be given to three CherokeesTEN THOUSAND DOLLARS reward one of the heroes of Fort Mims—a boon which it so well becomes us to bestow.  A few chosen favorites divide among themselves upwards of ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, leaving a pittance for distribution among the great body of the chiefs and warriors of the nation.

“ But the administration, though it condemns the fraud, thinks that we have no power to prevent its consummation.  What, sir, have we no power to see that our own treaty is carried into effect ?  Have we no interest in doing so ?  Have we no power ?  We have stipulated for the payment of two hundred and forty-seven thousand dollars to the chiefs of the Creek nation, to be distributed among the chiefs and warriors of that nation.  Is not the distribution part of the contract as well as the payment ?  We know that a few of those chiefs, in fraudulent violation of the rights secured by that treaty, are about to appropriate this money to themselves.  Are we powerless to prevent it ?  Nay, must we, too, suffer ourselves to be made the conscious instruments of its consummation ?  We have made a bargain with a savage tribe which you choose to dignify with the name of a treaty concerning whom we legislate with their consent, or without it, as it seems good in our eyes.  We know that some ten or twenty of them are about to cheat the remainder.  We have the means in our hands, without which their corrupt purpose cannot be effected.  Have we not the right to see that our own bargain is honestly fulfilled ?  Consistently with common honesty, can we put the consideration money of the contract into the hands of those who we know are about to defraud the people who trusted them ?  Sir, the proposition is absurd.

“ Mr. Forsyth (of the House of Representatives) said :  A stupendous fraud, it seems, was intended by the delegation who had formed, with the Secretary of War, the new contract.  The chiefs composing the Creek diplomatic train, assisted by their Cherokee secretaries of legation, had combined to put into their own pockets, and those of a few select friends, somewhere about three fourths of the first payment to be made for the second cession of the lands lying in Georgia.  The facts connected with this transaction, although concealed from the Senate when the second contract was before them for ratification, and from the House when the appropriation bill to carry it into effect was under consideration, were perfectly understood at the War Department by the Secretary, and by his clerk, who is called the head of the Indian Bureau (Mr. Thomas L. McKinney).  The Senate having, by some strange fortune, discovered the intended fraud, after the ratification of the contract, and before they acted on the appropriation bill, wished, by an amendment to the bill, to prevent the success of the profitable scheme of villany.  The House, entirely ignorant of the facts, and not suspecting the motive of the amendment, had rejected it, insisted upon their disagreement to it, and a committee of the two Houses, as usual, had conferred on the subject.  Now, that the facts are ascertained by the separate reports of the Committees, there can be no difference of opinion on the great point of defeating the intended treachery of the delegation and secretaries to the Creek tribe.  The only matter which can bear discussion, is, how shall the treachery be punished ? — how shall the Creek tribe be protected from the abominable designs of their worthless and unprincipled agents ?  Will the amendment proposed by the committee reach their object ?  The plan is, to pay the money to the chiefs, to be divided among the chiefs and warriors, under the direction of the Secretary of War, in a full council of the nation, convened for the purpose.  Suppose the council in solemn session, the money before them, and the division about to be made, under the direction of the Secretary of War—may not the chiefs and their secretaries claim the money, as promised to them under the treaty, and how will the Secretary or his agent resist the claim ?  They assented—the House will perceive that the only difficulty was the amount of the bribe.  The Secretary was willing to go as high as five thousand dollars, but could not stretch to ten thousand dollars.  Notwithstanding the assent of the Cherokees, and the declaration of the Secretary, that five thousand dollars each was the extent that they could be allowed, Ridge and Vann, after the treaty was signed, and before it was acted on by the Senate, or submitted to that body, brought a paper, the precious list of the price of each traitor, for the inspection and information of the head of the bureau and the head of the department ;  and what answer did they receive from both ?  The head of the bureau said it was their own affair.  The Secretary said he presumed it was their own affair.  But I ask this House, if the engagement for the five thousand dollars, and the list of the sums to be distributed, may not be claimed as part of this new contract ?  If these persons have not a right to claim, in the face of the tribe, these sums, as promised to them by their Great Father ?  Ay, sir ;  and, if they are powerful enough in the tribe, they will enforce their claim.  Under what pretext will your Secretary of War direct a different disposition or division of the money, after his often repeated declaration, ‘it is their own affair’—the affair of the delegation ?  Yes, sir, so happily has this business been managed at the seat of government, under the Executive eye, that this division which the negotiators proposed to make of the spoil, may be termed a part of the consideration of the contract.  It must be confessed that these exquisite ambassadors were quite liberal to themselves, their secretaries, and particular friends :  one hundred and fifty-nine thousand seven hundred dollars, to be divided among some twenty persons, is pretty well !  What name shall we give to this division of money among them ?  To call it a bribe, would shock the delicacy of the War Department, and possibly offend those gentle spirited politicians, who resemble Cowper’s preachers, ‘ who could not mention hell to cars polite.’  The transcendent criminality of this design cannot be well understood, without recalling to recollection the dark and bloody scenes of the year past.  The chief McIntosh, distinguished at all times by his courage and devotion to the whites, deriving his name of the White Warrior, from his mixed parentage, had formed, with his party, the treaty of the Indian Springs.  He was denounced for it.  His midnight sleep was broken by the crackling flames of his dwelling burning over his head.  Escaping from the flames, he was shot down by a party acting under the orders of the persons who accused him of betraying, for his own selfish purposes, the interest of the tribe.  Those who condemned that chief, the incendiaries and the murderers, are the negotiators of this new contract ;  the one hundred and fifty-nine thousand dollars, is to be the fruit of their victory over the assassinated chief.  What evidence of fraud, and selfishness, and treachery, has red or white malice been able to exhibit against the dead warrior ?  A reservation of land for him, in the contract of 1821, was sold by him to the United States, for twenty-five thousand dollars ;  a price he could have obtained from individuals, if his title had been deemed secure.  This sale of property given to him by the tribe, was the foundation of the calumnies that have been heaped upon his memory, and the cause which, in the eyes of our administration newspaper editors, scribblers, and reviewers, justified his execution, Now, sir, the executioners are to be rewarded by pillaging the public Treasury.  I look with some curiosity for the indignant denunciations of this accidentally discovered treachery.  Perhaps it will be discovered that all this new business of the Creeks is ‘ their own affair,’ with which the white editors and reviewers have nothing to do.  Fortunately, Mr. F. said, Congress had something to do with this affair.  We owe a justice to the tribe.  This amendment, he feared, would not do justice.  The power of Congress should be exerted, not only to keep the money out of the hands of these wretches, but to secure a faithful and equal distribution of it among the whole Creek nation.  The whole tribe hold the land ;  their title by occupancy resides in all ;  all are rightfully claimants to equal portions of the price of their removal from it.  The country is not aware how the Indian annuities are distributed, or the moneys paid to the tribes disposed of.  They are divided according to the discretion of the Indian government, completely aristocratical—all the powers vested in a few chiefs.  F. had it from authority he could not doubt, that the Creels annuities had, for years past, been divided in very unequal proportions, not among the twenty thousand souls of which the tribe was believed to be composed, but among about one thousand five hundred chiefs and warriors.

“ Mr. Forsyth expressed his hope that the House would reject the report of the committee.  Before taking his seat, he asked the indulgence of the House, while he made a few comments on this list of worthies, and the prices to be paid to each.  At the head of the list stands Mr. Ridge, with the sum of $15,000 opposite to his elevated name.  This man is no Creek, but a Cherokee, educated among the whites ;  allied to them by marriage—has received lessons in Christianity, morality, and sentiment—perfectly civilized, according to the rules and customs of Cornwall.  This negotiation, of which he has been, either as actor or instrument, the principal manager, is an admirable proof of the benefits he has derived from his residence among a moral and religious people.  Vann, another Cherokee, half savage and half civilized, succeeds him with $15,000 bounty.  A few inches below comes another Ridge, the major, father to the secretary—a gallant old fellow, who did some service against the hostile Creeks, during the late war, for which he deserved and received acknowledgments—but what claims he had to this Creek money, Mr. F. could not comprehend.  Probably his name was used merely to cover another gratuity for the son, whose modesty would not permit him to take more than $15,000 in his own name.  These Cherokees were together to receive $40,000 of  Creek money, and the Secretary of War is of opinion it is quite consistent with the contract which provides for the distribution of it among the chiefs and warriors of the Creeks.  Look, sir, at the distinction made for these exquisites.  Yopothle Yoholo, whose word General Gaines would take against the congregated world, is set down for but $10,000.  The Little Prince but $10.000.  Even Menawee, distinguished as he is as the leader of the party who murdered McIntosh and Etome Tustunnuggee—as one of the accursed band who butchered three hundred men, women, and children, at Fort Mims—has but $10,000.  A distinguished Red Stick, in these days, when kindness to Indians is shown in proportion to their opposition to the policy of the General Government, might have expected better treatment —only ten thousand dollars to our enemy in war and in peace !  But, sir, I will not detain the House longer.  I should hold myself criminal if I had exposed these things unnecessarily or uselessly.  That patriotism only is lovely which, imitating the filial piety of the sons of the Patriarch, seeks, with averted face, to cover the nakedness of the country from the eye of a vulgar and invidious curiosity.  But the commands of public duty must be obeyed ;  let those who have imposed this duty upon us answer for it to the people.”

“ Mr. Tatnall, of Geo. (H.R.)  He was as confident as his colleagues could be, that the foulest fraud had been projected by some of the individuals calling themselves a part of the Creek delegation, and that it was known to the department of war before the ratification of the treaty, and was not communicated by that department to the Senate, either before or during the pendency of the consideration of the treaty by that body.  Mr. T. said he would not, however, for the reasons just mentioned, dwell on this ground, but would proceed to state, that he was in favor of the amendment offered by the committee of conference, (and therein he differed from his colleague), which, whilst it would effectually prevent the commission of the fraud intended, would, also, avoid a violation of the terms of ‘ the new treaty,’ as it was styled.  He stated, that the list whack he held in his hand was, itself, conclusive evidence of a corrupt intention to divide the greater part of the money among the few persons named in it.  In this list, different sums were written opposite the names of different individuals, such, for instance, as the following :  ‘ John Ridge, $15,000—Joseph Vann, 15,000’ (both Cherokees, and not Creeks, and, therefore, not entitled to one cent).  The next, a long and barbarous Indian name, which I shall not attempt to pronounce, ‘$10,000’—next, John Stedham, ‘ $10,000,’ &c.  This list, as it appears in the documents received from the Secretary of War, was presented to the war department by Ridge and Vann.”